Talk:Bioaerosol

Occupational Safety and Health Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to occupational safety and health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Occupational Safety and HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthTemplate:WikiProject Occupational Safety and HealthOccupational Safety and Health articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article includes a very long reference list, but very little content. The reference list should be trimmed to include only those references actually used. --148.208.179.155 17:59, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Any reference added without a clear indication of where it was used should be removed. --Ronz 16:06, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Although I know what ACGIH is, I suggest that its definition be included - American Conference of Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.147.52.36 (talk) 10:34, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amount of references and "citation needed" tags[edit]

I noticed that in the very original version of this page, there were many references listed that were not properly cited inline. Now, there seems to be quite a few "Citation needed" tags and for the amount of information that is on the page, 3 references doesn't seem like enough. Where did this information come from if there are only 3 references? Based on the previous comments on the talk page, I don't think the issue was the lengthy references section and I don't believe the solution was to remove the majority of them. I think what should have been done was to correctly cite the references into the article.

Kchang99 (talk) 01:35, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]