Talk:Big Painting No. 6/GA1
GA Review[edit]
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 04:11, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Lead is a bit short. Surely it can be expanded on further?
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:32, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- It once set a record auction price for a painting by a living American artist. --> For how much?
- fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:19, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Big Painting No. 6 is in the Kunstsammlung Nordrhein-Westfalen collection in Düsseldorf. --> Unsourced
- ref added.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:37, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Not sure if details is the best title for the heading. Description, maybe?
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:14, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Critical commentary --> Reception
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:14, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- I see no other issues with the article. It is well referenced and written.
Way too much copyrighted material in the footnotes. No excuse for this. Editor should have used his own words. MathewTownsend (talk) 23:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)