Talk:Big 12 Conference baseball tournament

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1999-2005 format[edit]

After looking at schedules from the tournaments, it appears that in those years it wasn't actually a true double-elim tourney, but instead a CWS-style, 2 4-team double-elim, with championship game (Template:SECBracket type). Or am I misunderstanding it? Please clarify. Oughgh 20:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like you may be right. My bad. I just double checked on the 2004 tourney and it looks like a CWS-style tourney. I didn't check on the others. I'm pretty sure I check 1999 yesterday when I wrote the article and it was pure double elim. Maybe it changed somewhere in between. Seancp 20:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops, I was wrong again. 1999 was CWS-style as well. Seancp 20:35, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 05:51, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Big 12 Conference Baseball Tournament. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:21, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]