Talk:Bengal Volunteers

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Bengal Volunteers or Congress Volunteer Corps?[edit]

Can someone please verify if Bengal Volunteers is the same as Congress Volunteer Corps. If not, there may be a serious issue with the title of this article.Soham "Samrat" Banerjee (talk) 18:32, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There definitely seems to be some issues with the references. E.g. the first citation is Srilata Chatterjee's [Politics in Bengal], which refers to Bengal volunteers of the Congress Party (see pg. 147) and not a separate force titled "Bengal Volunteers". The cited pages (130-132) do not, in my view, support the claim being made. - Naushervan (talk) 16:46, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]