Talk:Ben Swann/Archives/2019/March
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Section 3. Controversial views and claims
The middle of the fourth paragraph of section 3. Controversial views and claims
has run off the grammatical rails:
The piece used language that was similar to Russian propaganda about Syria. In addition, Russian-backed production and distribution of polished videos that were spread on Facebook and websites in the United States.
I'd boldly edit, but am not sure of the intent. — Neonorange (Phil) 05:54, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- I just edited this... at first removing the word "that"... but then removing the second sentence entirely. It's not necessary and gets a little off point for this article.–CaroleHenson (talk) 10:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for all the reconstruction. After the considerable back-and-forth, excess was bound to linger. — Neonorange (Phil) 17:55, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- In all fairness, that addition came from me... and was clearly a mistake.–CaroleHenson (talk) 18:50, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for all the reconstruction. After the considerable back-and-forth, excess was bound to linger. — Neonorange (Phil) 17:55, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- I just edited this... at first removing the word "that"... but then removing the second sentence entirely. It's not necessary and gets a little off point for this article.–CaroleHenson (talk) 10:15, 30 July 2018 (UTC)