Talk:Battle Pass (Brooklyn)

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

United States: Revolutionary War Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - American Revolutionary War task force.

Mountains Low‑importance

	Mountains portal This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

On 25 April 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Battle Pass to Battle Pass (Brooklyn). The result of the discussion was moved.

Redoubt Hill position[edit]

It is unclear to me if Redoubt Hill was to the east or west of Flatbush Road, sources seem to be contradictory, and quite how the topography has been artificially altered from then to now.--Pharos (talk) 15:04, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1876 monument source at Brooklyn College[edit]

In an archival box: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1036&context=bc_arch_find --Pharos (talk) 14:36, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Roads[edit]

I can't quite figure out which roads crossed around Flatbush Pass besides Flatbush Road, and what they were called. Also, the location and history of the toll-house.--Pharos (talk) 17:01, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 25 April 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 17:42, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Battle Pass → Battle Pass (Brooklyn) – As much as I don't like to put abstract concepts over real life things, I believe that battle pass is the clear primary topic for the upper-case version as well. The idea of a "Battle Pass" is often capitalized, as with the well-known example in Fortnite, so WP:DIFFCAPS doesn't apply in this case. As an example, see this article, which capitalizes Battle Pass like a proper noun. Pageviews for the gaming concept are massively higher than the historic pass. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 23:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per WP:DIFFCAPS. There is already a hatnote on this article, and since there are only 2 possibilities, the only thing a dab page would do is create an extra step for those seeking the actual pass with no benefit to those few seeking the video-game sense. The fact that pageviews for the lower case article are 25x higher than upper case means that an absolute maximum of 4% of readers looking for the gaming sense are typing capitals, and that assumes no one is looking for the actual pass. So there doesn't seem to be a problem with large numbers of readers seeking the gaming concept through Battle Pass. And it's at least as likely someone seeking the real Battle Pass would not bother typing capitals than someone seeking the gaming concept would unnecessarily type capitals, so there's also no evidence for a PRIMARYREDIRECT. Station1 (talk) 07:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - the article about the video game concept (at the lowercase title) is clearly the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC since it does have 25 times the number of pageviews as this article. WP:DIFFCAPS states Ambiguity may arise when typographically near-identical expressions have distinct meanings. I think that is the case here. Moving the page about the less popular article (Battle Pass in Brooklyn), and adding a hatnote from the more popular article (the generic battle pass), should help readers.
As for Station1's point that people who search for the article about the place in Brooklyn are deliberately typing capitals, that may not necessarily be the case anymore, with the growing use of voice-search products such as Google Voice Search or Amazon Alexa. Since voice searches are case-insensitive, it may be likely that people looking for one article may be directed to the other article (and this can go both ways). – Epicgenius (talk) 13:04, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support I feel that the capitalization is more deserving for the video game monetization strategy, as it is a lot more popular on Wikipedia.Since this is less known, the clarification will make the articles topic a lot clearer, and the video game concept easier to find.

Spacebyte (talk) 16:53, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.