Talk:Bateshwar Hindu temples, Madhya Pradesh

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bateshwar Hindu temples, Madhya Pradesh article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hinduism Mid‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Original research?[edit]

Nice expansion of an interesting site. But "The site has been a confused assemblage of ruins with randomly mixed temple parts, and there is no evidence that the original temples looked like the newly re-assembled temples from the ruins." doesn't really seem justified by the source. The stones were no doubt lying where they had fallen, which is not "randomly mixed", and the article emphasizes the use of Sanscrit texts, and it's clear from the "before" photo that some temples remained essentially intact. Johnbod (talk) 14:46, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. No, not quite. That para should have additional sources, somehow I missed it. I will go back to the sources, recheck and clarify. Give me a week or so (or I welcome you and others to please feel free to check the sources on this site and revise the article). Ms Sarah Welch (talk) 16:34, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]