This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Bart McCulloch is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Player is senior listed and eligible to play immediately in the 2009 premiership season. I am mindful of the fact that AFL squads are fairly sizable however I'd suggest all senior listed players are of equal notability. Surely players such as Nicholas Naitanui, taken in the same draft as McCulloch are of substantial notability. AFL recruitment is a highly publicised activity and Naitanui had long been identified as an early draft pick, several years in advance. Regardless of this, once players are drafted they are relatively equal... i.e they are now senior listed AFL players eligible to play senior football immediately. Where does one draw the line? I'd suggest all senior listed players are of substantial notability. Rookie listed players however should perhaps be considered lazcking in notability until they are elevated to a senior list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheBrownDog (talk • contribs) 03:59, 11 January 2009
.svg){kind=logo}
