Talk:Badhshala

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:17, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that 2013 Nepali historical drama Badhshala was briefly banned by the Nepali Army because the actors wore military uniforms without permission? Source: Rana, Trishna (2013). "Arms and the men". Nepali Times. Retrieved 21 October 2020. "The NA initially said it objected because the actors wore military uniforms without permission."

Created by CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk). Self-nominated at 15:48, 21 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: All OK, assuming it is normal not to have sources for the synopsis in a film page. DrThneed (talk) 04:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hey DrThneed, the plot does not require sources because works of fiction are primary sources in their articles. ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 06:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
CAPTAIN MEDUSA Thanks, that's what I suspected. DrThneed (talk) 06:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification[edit]

Am reviewing for DYK. There is a sentence in the synopsis that doesn't quite make sense: "It shows that innocents and Maoists detainees were forced to sign a paper saying that they were Maoists whom were later killed by the army in a jungle."

As it reads you are saying that the paper had written on it that these people would be killed by the army in the jungle. I imagine the paper didn't actually say that. Presumably it is more likely that they were forced to sign a paper saying that they were Maoists, and were later killed by the army in the jungle. Please clarify though as I won't change it myself not having seen the film and possibly having misunderstood what was meant. DrThneed (talk) 04:36, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]