Talk:Béla III of Hungary/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 3family6 (talk · contribs) 04:14, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
No copyvios detected, just some Wikipedia mirrors.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

High quality, polished prose.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Follow MOS.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:
Well formatted reference sections provided.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
If anything, the article is over-cited.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

C. No original research:
All content is verifiable and attributable to sources.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Sticks to major aspects.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Focused:
Focused on subject, no extraneous material.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Neutral, balanced discussion, with differing historical perspectives provided where appropriate.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
No instances of edit warring, vandalism, or other disruption since this article was created in 2003.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
All licensing checks out. I took the liberty of filling out a few parameters on some images.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Images are useful, relevant, and have appropriate captions.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 20:48, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Overall: An excellent article, ready for FAC in my opinion.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 04:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pass or Fail: