Talk:Aztec, New Mexico crashed saucer hoax

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Aztec, New Mexico crashed saucer hoax article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Paranormal Low‑importance

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative Views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Aztec, New Mexico crashed saucer hoax appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 April 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Aztec UFO Crash was faked to sell devices called "doodlebugs"?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/April.

Wikipedia

Short Unbalanced Article[edit]

This article is too short and explains nothing.

It's also unbalanced because it only gives a single picture of events. Others (especially when concerning ufo incidents) will think differently about a topic such as this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nibinaear (talk • contribs) 19:09, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs a superhero[edit]

But a nerdy historian will suffice. Alan G. Archer (talk) 08:49, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Benjamin Radford - recent addition/revert[edit]

Benjamin Radford may well have written a book about this but - what did he say about the topic? Alexbrn (talk) 15:26, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2016 updates, revisions[edit]

I've done some needed revisions and restructuring of the article based on the addition of reliable sources that are independent of ufology. Note that I've left the Farmington Daily Times citations in, but since this is a local paper promoting a UFO book by local authors as well as a local UFO event designed to raise funds, their coverage of the topic is overly credulous, to say the least. - LuckyLouie (talk) 19:38, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@LuckyLouie: Why is this title so odd? Seems it should drop the last comma, and indicate the confirmed hoax. Aztec, New Mexico UFO hoax? – SJ + 18:36, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't recall editing the title, but bear in mind it was 5 years ago. ~~What "title" are you talking about?~~ Ah, OK. If you're asking my opinion about whether the article should be moved to Aztec, New Mexico UFO hoax, I would agree. Its status as a hoax is supported by WP:RS, so the proposed title is appropriate. - LuckyLouie (talk) 18:57, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, updated. I know it's a long time ago! I just happened across it... – SJ + 20:11, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]