Talk:Austrosynthemis

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Austrosynthemis is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Monotypy[edit]

I find this page quite confusing with its adherence to the rules for monotypy: WP:TOL

The heading of the page is the GENUS, yet the text of the article, and the taxonbox, is about the SPECIES. However, the categories, the taxonbar, and the links to wikispecies refer to the GENUS.

There is a SPECIES page, however its main function is to redirect to the GENUS. That species page needs its own categories, a taxonbar, and links to wikispecies, yet all of those seem inappropriate on a page that is difficult to get to, and by its nature as a redirection pointer, readers are probably not supposed to get to.

Does anyone mind if I create two separate pages: one for the genus and one for the species? John Tann (talk) 19:08, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As noted in the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Austrosynthemis_cyanitincta, this article and its redirect is exactly in line with existing guidelines at WP:MONOTYPICFAUNA and WP:MONOTYPICFLORA, so should be left as it is. Peter coxhead (talk) 09:26, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]