Talk:Atesh

Military history: Russian & Soviet / Post-Cold War

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force
	Post-Cold War task force

WP:RS[edit]

"November 11, 2022: Partisans of the movement liquidated 30 Russian servicemen in hospitals in Simferopol."

As I understand it, Ukrainian sources are not deemed reliable enough in this case. Get an international news site. And even if they were reliable, the author forgot to add "claimed", which distorts the meaning.

Let's be honest, there is no way partisans killed 30 soldiers in Crimea and it didn't make it into the foreign press. 2A02:3037:41C:D2A3:1:1:1DBF:7245 (talk) 17:13, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 November 2023[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (closed by non-admin page mover) BegbertBiggs (talk) 23:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

* Atesh (movement) → Atesh

Atesh → Atesh (disambiguation) or it should be deleted.

Per WP:TITLEDAB, disambiguation is only necessary when there is otherwise an actual conflict in article titles. No such conflict in titles exists. Per WP:CONCISE, concision is preferred over unnecessary precision. Atesh is not the same as Atash. Parham wiki (talk) 22:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Only one Atesh on WP. A hatnote pointing to the dab page Atash is sufficient. Station1 (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Why does this have an article[edit]

This so called movement is fake the lack of actual sources and evidence for their claimed sabotage is already indicated enough can Wikipedia has no obligation to take part in the misinformation warfare of Ukraine 2A02:587:E80C:7AE1:C484:EDA5:1785:A934 (talk) 09:07, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]