Talk:Assistant commandant

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in November 2014.

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Willbb234, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 13 September 2019.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Capitalisation[edit]

2405:204:6388:f289:905f:b99b:11ff:29e Why are all of the ranks capitalized? This doesn't comply with MOS:JOBTITLES or MOS:MILTERMS. Eyer ^contact 20:41, 20 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because thats how military ranks and government officials designations are written everywhere in the world you need to give some respect to the. Also most of the people dont know the full form of designations e.g. the word ACP is known to all but many people dont know that its full form is Assistant Commissioner of Police. So you should use capital letters as well as their short forms. Eyer ka baap (talk) 06:33, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am fine with re-adding the acronyms, but per Wikipedia's style guide, the ranks should remain lowercase. —Eyer (If you reply, add {{reply to|Eyer}} to your message to let me know.) 12:50, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okay..add the acronyms so that it could be understood by every reader. Eyer ka baap (talk) 17:52, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do what I told you Eyer ka baap (talk) 17:18, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how this works. If you want the acronyms added, add them. —Eyer (If you reply, add {{reply to|Eyer}} to your message to let me know.) 18:59, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OR[edit]

@Eyer: I feel like wiping out a bunch of the OR in the India section would be the best course of action. It also seems unfocused and a little hard to follow. I've tried my best to copyedit it, but I think it needs to go? Regards, Willbb234^Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 20:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it. —Eyer (If you reply, add {{reply to|Eyer}} to your message to let me know.) 23:12, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard. I just blanket-removed a bunch of unsourced content. We'll see if it gets added back with citations. —Eyer (If you reply, add {{reply to|Eyer}} to your message to let me know.) 23:17, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]