Talk:Arkansas Highway 1

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Locations	Arkansas
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

United States: Arkansas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Arkansas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Arkansas (assessed as Low-importance).

Attention rationale[edit]

Route description is written from north to south. – T M F 05:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I re-wrote the rd and removed the attention tag. Brandonrush Woooooooo pig sooie 14:35, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some avenues to improve this article[edit]

Remove the bannered routes. Put them in a Bannered routes of Arkansas Highway 1 list. They dominate this article too much. Leave behind a summary section with a paragraph that briefly summarizes the different bannered routes. As "bannered route" is a bit of a neologism, you could use Business routes of Arkansas Highway 1 as the title of the article, and "Business routes" as the summary section header. A brief mention that one is called a "spur" route in the paragraph here and the lead paragraph in the other article will resolve that discrepancy. Done
Merge the two infoboxes together. {{infobox road}} supports up to 4 sections of a highway. You can list a length for each segment as well as one for the whole highway. Done
I'd even merge the two junction lists, using a colspan to mark the gap between the two segments. Done
If I can be a tad blunt: "Segment 1" and "Segment 2" are clunky-sounding names. How about "Southern segment" and "Northern segment"? Done
You can even merge the RDs together if desired by using "McGehee–Jonesboro" as one subheading and "Clay County" as the second. If so, then I'd use the Southern/northern segment names as subsections of the history. Done

I hope these suggestions help. Imzadi 1979 → 00:57, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is my attempt to standardize AR. I think that AR is in awful shape, but I have found some great resources and I am now ready to clean it up. I used "Segment 1" because on articles such as Arkansas Highway 74, north and south couldn't be used. I know it's not the best solution, but I don't know what should be used that could apply in all situations. I also have avoided using the word "section" because it has an actual meaning in "AHTD language" that could be confusing to readers. I really want to make this article a showcase for the rest of the state, and am willing to improve it before moving on in AR. Any input is welcome, I really think that getting some standards in place would help AR significantly, and possibly attract some other editors. I am especially open to doing anything that would attract folks from other states. Brandonrush Woooooooo pig sooie 01:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, but when you have a better option than Segment 1 and Segment 2, use it. In casual conversation, I will use section, segment and even portion interchangeably, but that does not mean when there are specific meanings I will use all three. Just as we should use common names for article titles, we should use natural language in our writing, unless there's a good reason to use a technical name. Imzadi 1979 → 03:11, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

B class[edit]

I am wondering if a willing editor could help me in my effort to make this a B-class article by checking against the criteria for B-Class status. What else does it need? Thanks. Brandonrush Wooooo pig sooie 17:22, 19 April 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.184.160.174 (talk) [reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arkansas Highway 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:22, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Arkansas Highway 1. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]