Talk:Aquemini/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Reviews
Rapreviews.com and Rap Pages are professional review sites as is Warr.org. Why are they being removed from infoboxes?
---Dan56 12:51, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
Fair Use
I do not think "Fair Use" applies to this copyright album cover. It could get the Wikipedia project into trouble to use it. Caltrop
I think the part of this page that describes each song in detail needs to be edited. It doesn't really convey the professionalism or objective viewpoint I see elsewhere. Since I'm new, I thought I would give someone a chance to respond before laying in. Monkeyfacebag 22:29, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
- I found it fascinating but lots of original research needs trimming out. I might have a go some time. Soo 18:53, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
What is wrong with the bold text on the second song? I can't seem to fix it at all.
- Fixed it!
Silly Inclusion
"Though Stankonia and Speakerboxxx/The Love Below would be more commercially successful, many fans view Aquemini as OutKast's definitive album."
First of all, Stankonia and Speakerboxxx/The Love Below are quite clearly more popular than Aquemini; "Commercially successful" isn't a euphamism for less hip, and if certain albums are more popular than others, there's no reason to state that "many fans view Aquemini as Outkast's definitive album"." People who view this as their best record exist, I'm sure (although they probably tend to favor it since it wasn't a pop hit), but there's no reason at all to include this point in an encyclopedia article since it's obviously POV and there's no citation for it either. It's another subtle way of adding POV to an article.
The track-list is stanking brilliant!
Fair use rationale for Image:Aqueminicvr.jpg
Image:Aqueminicvr.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 19:45, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
RS 500
Wasn't this one on the list?? The Person Who Is Strange 16:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
USA Today review
Transcription using Google News Advanced News Archive Search. USA Today (Jones, Steve. 04.D. September 29, 1998) review of Aquemini (1998):
Outkast, Aquemini ( * * * 1/2) No one ever could accuse Outkast of having a hole in its hip-hop soul. In fact, funk just oozes from this latest set by the Atlanta duo of Big Boi and Dre, whose molasses-smooth raps speak to the stark realities of urban streets. And with the hard-driving, Southern-fried grooves provided by live studio musicians, these songs not only make you dance, they make you sweat. As on its first two albums -- 1994's Southernplayalisticadillacmuzik and 1996's ATLiens -- Outkast stays way shy of the usual hip-hop beats and cliches. For this pair, originality is always in style.
— Steve Jones
Dan56 (talk) 20:52, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011
Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links: