Talk:Anna Maria Jopek

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Untitled[edit]

Wikipedia is written from a Neutral point of view - you can't just praise your favourite artist :-). Please just add factual, unbiased information. Dan100 (Talk) 10:17, July 27, 2005 (UTC)



You are right. I have readded the "music" part but this time i've cut all the praise words and stuff :). Now it's much more a "fact" article then a "she is the best" one :) And next time - don't delete everything from the article - its much better to just edit it if it has some important information. Thanks ;) --sturm 22:22, 24 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Soucres[edit]

tell me what is wrong with sources that i have used, why ZPAV, OLiS, Interia.pl and Universal Music Poland are not good sources, i can remove iTunes if thats the problem, but as i have mentioned on your discussion page, everyone use Itunes as source for digital download format 66.102.129.154 (talk) 12:11, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As sources, Olis is effectively a mirror of ZPAV, which provides its info, and Interia.pl is a search engine- and one particularly useful to spammers, acc. the same link you provided!!!. So your sources, when put to the test of reliability, are rapidly reducing in number. Ciao! Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 12:53, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
OLiS is provided by ZPAV, and its not a mirror, all articles on Wikipedia use both ZPAV and OLiS, Interia.pl is not a search engine, its a web portal and a popular search engine 66.102.129.154 (talk) 12:55, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The point of course being that the first two are effectively the same source and the latter self-referencing. As I said, these sources define as WP:BOLLOCKS. Sorry pal Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:02, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
ZPAV page is linking to OLiS, to see full chart you need to go to OLiS archive, its not the same source, and it is not a mirror, and search engine on Interia is fixed with Google, so its not a search engine on its own 66.102.129.154 (talk) 13:10, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Independant, secondary sources. Ergo, not a search engine. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:11, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
tell my why linking to Billboard page to provide chart postions is ok, and any others national charts, and why in this case its wrong 66.102.129.154 (talk) 13:15, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
and in fact OLiS numbers are counted by TNS Poland on request from ZPAV, so ZPAV in fact, and other national charts are secondary source, in relation Nielsen SoundScan counts sales for Billboard 66.102.129.154 (talk) 13:19, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to remove all unsourced personal bio too; I'm sure you understand. Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:23, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

and one more thing, when you put on your page link to Google it doesn't make your page search engine, Interia was search engine on the beginning, and does not index pages on their own 66.102.129.154 (talk) 13:25, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
i don't understand, when you can't respond on a question you search other guidelines to prove i'm wrong, and you ignore questions, see how many pages links to ZPAV, and OLiS on Wikipedia 66.102.129.154 (talk) 13:28, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Since when is Google a reliable source on its own? I'm sorry, you are becoming somewhat incoherent. Are you going into meltdown? Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi 13:31, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
your responses are still offensive, and as i sad you don't answer the questions 66.102.129.154 (talk) 13:32, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
i did change sources for Wirtualna Polska and Onet.pl, i also add others source for chart positions, hopefully it will be enough 66.102.129.154 (talk) 13:50, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So many bullets?[edit]

Thanks for contributing this article about this fine artist.  :?) I'm just wondering: Why did you use all those bullets in your tables? Bullets are usually necessary only when you present a list of items between paragraphs, to distinguish the list from the text. The items here are already in table cells (and are short enough to fit the cells without wrapping), so the tables would be much less cluttered without the bullets. Just a suggestion.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Anna Maria Jopek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Anna Maria Jopek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Anna Maria Jopek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:17, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]