Talk:Anglian Bus

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Added the fleetlist. Is it good? --Dennisman (talk) 18:10, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I have made a horrible mess of the fleetlist attempting to put it in a table. Please help and tell me where I went wrong. --Dennisman (talk) 18:15, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I've fixed the first line. But as the main article isn't for testing I'm going to remove the fleet list. I suggest you use the page's history to access it and then perfect in in the Sandbox or your userspace somewhere.
I would also question the need for such a large fleet list when exactly the same thing is on the company website. I would suggest something more like the summary on Arriva North West and Wales. Arriva436talk/contribs 19:01, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Claims of being in administration[edit]

Recently an IP has been posting claims that this company is in administration. This information needs to be removed unless accompanied by a reliable source. Manning (talk) 12:57, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Anglian Bus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:38, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Defunct[edit]

The company has since rebranded/ceased trading however annoyingly this wasn't picked up by news sources nor did Wayback Machine visit the website after October 2017 so sourcing is next to none at the moment - So I would ask that these non-reliable sources don't be removed unless their being replaced - 1 crap source is better than no source, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:37, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]