Talk:Angelica acutiloba

I have created a rewrite!

The rewrite still contains English errors, formatting errors and word-for-word copies of other websites. You have added these problems back into the article after they were removed more than once. Koumz (talk) 03:16, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you let me know which part that has English errors, formatting error and word for word copies? Thanks!Gracekellybaby (talk) 03:40, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of problems:

A.acutiloba should be A. acutiloba. This problem is in several places.
Angelica acutiloba should be Angelica acutiloba and iwatensis should be iwatensis in the picture captions.
In the taxobox, "subspecies variedades" is not English at all, it should be "Subspecies and varieties", 1937 should be 1937, and A. acutiloba var. sugiyamae should be A. acutiloba var. sugiyamae.
Angelica should be Angelica in the first section
In the flowers and fruits section, "The flowers are hermaphrodite (have both male and female organs)" and "The plant is self-fertile." are word-for-word copies from pfaf.org
The bottom picture has no caption
"as many species in the genus of Angelica" should be "like many species in the genus Angelica".
"The herb is used to treat various gynecological disease and as a crude drug in Kampo medicine. The root is emmenagogue, oxytocic, sedative and tonic." Both sentences are word-for-word copies.
"root extraction" should be "root extract". This problem is in several places.
There are several other sentences that are awkward. I don't have time to list them all now, maybe I will write again later.

Koumz (talk) 05:49, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Angelica acutiloba[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected links on Angelica acutiloba which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.drugfuture.com/pharmacopoeia/jp15/JP15_Search.aspx
Triggered by \bdrugfuture\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:45, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Angelica acutiloba. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:56, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]