Talk:Andrés Nocioni/GA1

Andrés Nocioni GA Reassessment[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force in an effort to ensure all listed Good articles continue to meet the Good article criteria. In reviewing the article, I have found there are a number of issues that need to be addressed.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):

The prose is OK, Maybe a 6/10.

It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):

Update it. Talk about him at the 2008 Olympics and the last two NBA seasons.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:40, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'd really like to see some more information about his personal life in the main body of the article, perhaps a section along the lines of: Where exactly was he born and who to; what was his childhood like; where did his go to school, college?; has he ever appeared in the news for any reason relating to his personal life?--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:40, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
It is stable.
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
Overall:
a Pass/Fail:

I will check back in no less than seven days. If progress is being made, the article will remain listed as a Good article. Otherwise, it may be delisted (such a decision may be challenged through WP:GAR). If improved after it has been delisted, it may be nominated at WP:GAN again. Feel free to drop a message on my talk page if you have any questions, and many thanks for all the hard work that has gone into this article thus far. (If you are really busy, let me know and I'll give more time. I need to know however so I can see that someone is interested in addressing these concerns. Regards--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:40, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Question - So if I get what your saying right, you think this article needs more substance? If thats true I can probably find someone experiencied on the subject to put some work into it or maybe do it myself. -Marcusmax(speak) 01:24, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sort of, it specifically needs substance on 1) his personal life and b) developments in the last two years. If you or anyone can supply this then I'd happily pass the article. Please don't feel pressured by time, as long as someone is or inteds to to be working on it I'm happy to hold off the review for as long as possible.--Jackyd101 (talk) 08:00, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like there is a big bulls following on WP:CHICAGO, I can probably find someone. -Marcusmax(speak) 00:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article has improved and I am willing to pass it, although I think there is still room for significant improvement in the years 2006 to present.--Jackyd101 (talk) 20:14, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]