Talk:Amunet

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Egypt: Egyptian religion Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Egyptian religion work group (assessed as Low-importance).

WikiProject Ancient Egypt to-do list:

Needed articles.

We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.

Cleanup.

To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?

Standardize the Chronology.

A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)

Stub sorting

Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .

Data sorting.

This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.

Women in Religion Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Error[edit]

The hieroglyphs are wrong. Amuntet is represented by a falcon over a feather ontop of a pole.

Example here: [1]

No, thats her determinative - it marks the collection of glyphs as a name of a specific god rather than what the name means. It goes at the end of the collection of glyphs.

The hieroglyphs in the article are roughly "A", "M", "N", and "T" (vowels, other than A, were not included - they are usually guessed to be "e", except where the way the jaw works makes it hard to say "e" in their place, preferring "u") "Amnt" => "amenet" or "amunet" (easier to pronounce) or "amaunet" (even easier to pronounce). "T" is the glyph that looks like half a circle - a mound ("tanen" in the egyptian language). "A" is the upstanding feather.

~~~~ ( ! | ? | * ) 01:55, 14 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

What one finds the easiest to pronounce depends on his or her native language, so we can't really tell what did Egyptians find easy to pronounce. – Alensha ^talk 16:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Too many uses of the word "originally" in the first paragraph; makes it read a bit awkwardly. T@nn 04:16, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Two Different Deities Here[edit]

Amentet is not the same goddess as Amaunet. Amaunet is the mate of Amun, the goddess of air. Amentet or Imentit is the goddess who welcomes the dead to the Duat. These should be two separate articles. 97.116.31.40 (talk) 20:47, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In Wilkinson's The Complete Gods and Gddesses of Ancient Egypt (2003) Amaunet and Imentit (Amentet) are clearly entirely separate deities. If anything, Imentit is an aspect of Hathor.

There's also no mention in Wilkinson of Amaunet being the mother who is father. This sounds to me like a confusion between Amaunet and Ptah-Naunet. 138.192.34.197 (97.116.31.40 on public terminal) 23:27, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you fix it, then? as you sound well-versed in the subject mathwhiz 29 01:59, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took the tag down as nobody did anything with this in months. If you have source, be bold and cite it! -- Secisek (talk) 10:06, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've cleared out the misinformation. Amunet is Amun's counterpart, and Imentet (now with her own article) is Hathor or Isis in the afterlife. Because I only used the information I could cite from Wilkinson, both articles are now stubs. A. Parrot (talk) 21:38, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Amun and Amunet?[edit]

A lot of Egyptian deities have male/female aspects like Amunet is the feminine aspect of Amun. Could we possibly merge this article with Amuns'? I ask because the Egyptian god articles are numerous and somewhat disorganized. Heilingetorix (talk) 11:00, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All too true. And because Egyptological information is hard to get at, it's hard to say when there just isn't enough information on a deity to justify a separate article. In Amaunet's case I lean toward keeping the article for now, because Amaunet wasn't quite as characterless as many other female counterparts. She had her own priests and was involved somehow in royal festivals (I'll add that to the article). I think it would be somewhat awkward to include all that in Amun's article. Still, I can't object outright to a merge, because information about her is so sparse. A. Parrot (talk) 17:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]