This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
I've changed they/them to Kuttner, so as to lesson the confusion. GoodDay (talk) 23:07, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I am not sure how much confusion there really is. The article identifies Kuttner as transgender and notes that they use they/them and he/him pronouns. In time, I think it may be a bit cumbersome to try to avoid "them/he" and always use only their/his last name. For what it is worth, this is our policy on pronouns: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Gender identity. It says avoiding pronouns "should only be done as a last resort". Reliable sources seem to be using "they/their". The easiest option is probably for us to follow their lead.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 23:29, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Does Kuttner also use "he/him"? GoodDay (talk) 23:31, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If we're going to use pronouns, then I recommend "he/him". GoodDay (talk) 23:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps, but they have also identified as non-binary as noted in the article. Using "he/him" might be pretty binary. Alternating between "he/they" would likely be confusing. As with most things, it is usually easiest for us to just follow the WP:RS. I have put a note on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject LGBT studies page, perhaps that will result in some further input, guidance, discussion.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 00:09, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If they identify as non-binary and use they/them pronouns, I'd suggest going with that, instead of he/him. Could you post some reliable sources using they/them, Darryl Kerrigan? Isabelle🔔 00:15, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sure. The press release from the party announcing Kuttner's appointment uses "they".[1] So do articles in the CBC,[2] Global News,[3] and the Tyee,[4] among others.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 00:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I support using they/them: as I understand it, the order in which a trans person lists their preferred pronouns (a/b/c) might indicate some preference towards a then b then c. Additionally, only using the last name is terrible for readability. Santacruz⁂Please tag me! 00:30, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"They/them" reads too confusing. Either we use "He/him" or just the surname. GoodDay (talk) 00:35, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It is not too confusing for the good readers of the CBC, Global News, Toronto Star[5] or the Tyee. Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Gender identity doesn't say anything about avoiding "they/their" pronouns. It does say avoiding pronouns altogether (ie only using surnames) "should only be done as a last resort".--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 00:48, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've asked for more input from WP:CANADA. GoodDay (talk) 01:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
They/them reads best to me, and is in keeping with what most sources are using. Replacing all the pronouns with the surname is awkward. Paul Erik(talk)(contribs) 01:15, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
They/them is Kuttner's apparent preference and what is being used in the media. I disagree that this is confusing; the singular they is well-attested. — Kawnhr (talk) 02:54, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how using they/them pronouns is confusing, especially since the article mentions that they use they/them pronouns. —{{u|CupOfTea696}} [ talk | contribs ] 03:48, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There seems to be a consensus to use they/them pronouns. I have restored them.--Darryl Kerrigan (talk) 05:13, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
'Tis too bad. But, that's the result. GoodDay (talk) 06:00, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that the article does not state clearly which is the birth gender and which is the present gender. A much clearer article on a transgender person is that on Chelsea Manning, which could be used as a model to improve this article. 156.34.234.213 (talk) 00:55, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are imposing a "birth gender"/"present gender" dichotomy that you would not find in sources about this article subject. - Astrophobe (talk) 21:39, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Re sources: there are two sources given for Kuttner's 2019 candidature, from the Vancouver Sun and from Huff Post Canada. These two sources consistently describe Kuttner as "she" and "her", which is not now reflected in the sentence which cites these two sources. 156.34.234.213 (talk) 15:20, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Per MOS:GENDERID, there is no reason that the formerly used pronouns should be reflected in this article. We simply refer to the current gender identity and only offer an explanation where this might be confusing/ASTONISHING. Newimpartial (talk) 15:39, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
