Talk:Already There

What makes a article Featured?

Hello fellow Wikipedia users. We are a small group of friends that would like to make some edits on the this article to make it that much better and possibly make it one of the next featured articles. What we plan to do, is add some more sections to the article and also add more detail to the sections already there( see what I did there?). Our overall goal is to make the article better \.Here are the Criteria we will be focusing on.

First of all, we will be focusing on a lead for the article, because this article clearly lacks one. The summary clearly lacks facts and it does not prepare us for the coming sections, plus it is not appealing/engaging. Our focus is to make the lead more catchy and make the reader want to read more. Also we want to make order to the summary, so we as readers are not jumping from place to place to find information.
 Our second focus will be to make the article more well written. Why this article is lacking this is, like we said on the last paragraph, it is not engaging. For this article to get the attention and care it needs, people will want to read it, and how do we make more people read it? simple, MAKE IT MORE INTERRESTING! This article clearly lacks a attention grabber, this article needs something at the top to make it more interesting, which is why we are here, to find that something.

The third Criteria we will be focusing on, is the Comprehensiveness of the article. For as we can see, from the extra research me and my friends found, there is a lot of information missing, important dates, how the band was formed, etc. Our job is to add the needed information that this article lacks, and make the article better and more organized.

    Why this criteria is important is that these are the building blocks of a good article, yes some of these are in the article, but they are not presented properly, that is our job, to make sure that these criteria are met and make this article possibly the next featured article.

MrPotoad (talk) 13:48, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Already There. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222224958/http://worshipleader.com/come-to-the-well%E2%80%A8-casting-crowns%E2%80%A8/ to http://worshipleader.com/come-to-the-well%E2%80%A8-casting-crowns%E2%80%A8/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120512100331/http://watchgmctv.com/music/review/album/casting-crowns-come-well to http://www.watchgmctv.com/music/review/album/casting-crowns-come-well
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140222233627/http://gfa.radioandrecords.com/PublishGFA/GFAChristianNextPage.asp?sDate=10%2F15%2F2012&Format=21 to http://gfa.radioandrecords.com/PublishGFA/GFAChristianNextPage.asp?sDate=10%2F15%2F2012&Format=21

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:07, 2 July 2017 (UTC)