Talk:Alma Julia Hightower

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.cityofangelschurchrs.com/newsletter/halo_june2010.htm. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 15:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note, other parts of this article also appeared to have contained copy pasted text. Some of it was from Wikipedia itself, but not all. I have removed large chunks of this article which merely repeated information about her former students who have their own articles on Wikipedia. I also removed the the confusing section on the park renaming which (a) never happened and (b) was full of original research with no referencing whatsoever. Voceditenore (talk) 15:15, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I have also removed a lengthy and unencyclopedic autobiography of her grandson Klif Burton, unreferenced, and full of original research. Voceditenore (talk) 15:43, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic edits[edit]

Please do not use <br> in the formatting. The addition of it completely messed up the references. Please do not add commentary like "(more details needed)". This does not belong in the article. Commentary like this belongs here on the talk page. Voceditenore (talk) 16:56, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]