Talk:All for Jesus, All for Jesus

Christianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).

Christian music

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christian music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christian music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Christian musicWikipedia:WikiProject Christian musicTemplate:WikiProject Christian musicChristian music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

A fact from All for Jesus, All for Jesus appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 March 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that "All for Jesus, All for Jesus" was the closing hymn of The Crucifixion and set aside for congregational singing?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/All For Jesus, All For Jesus.

Wikipedia

First publication as a standalone hymn[edit]

At the beginning of the article it says 1901, later on it says 1969. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:810D:1380:2788:DC6D:DE14:1622:329E (talk) 17:37, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]