Talk:Aitch

This page was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 6 February 2020. The result of the discussion was keep.

Disambiguation

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

This is the talk page of a disambiguation page, which is a non-article that lists actual articles with similar names. This page may not be frequently watched.

Consensus to endorse dab page[edit]

@DMacks, UnitedStatesian, Narky Blert, and Soumya-8974:

I noticed that Drmies kindly closed the Aitch RfD as "keep," due to a sockpuppet "trolling around." Keeping that result would mean we should be converting it back to a redirect to H. However, I Like the way the dab page shaped up thanks to @Narky Blert and DMacks:, so I thought I'd start a quick discussion to confirm whether or not everyone endorses the dab page. No rationale needed, per WP:NOTBURO; just !vote with either endorse dab page or convert back to redirect.

Cheers,
--Doug Mehus T·C 02:00, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever you say, Dmehus. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 02:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse, obvs. Narky Blert (talk) 05:27, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse. --Soumyabrata (talk • subpages) 11:20, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse per above, and because I think we have enough separate dab links to separate this from the H dab page. --Doug Mehus T·C 13:09, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Endorse dab. Thanks all. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:00, 7 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak endorse. The DAB page is viable, but it could either live here, or at Aitch (disambiguation) with the redirect retained as WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. DMacks (talk) 13:28, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe true, but I just think that if we have a viable, non-parenthetically qualified article name that's only being used as a little-used redirect, the dab page should be able to live there per WP:COMMONSENSE, WP:IAR, and any other applicable policies that would be better in substantiating the argument than a common sense/IAR endorse, potentially. Doug Mehus T·C 14:34, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]