Talk:Air raids on Japan/GA1
GA Review[edit]
- First impressions are good and its a very big article, well done.Jim Sweeney (talk) 16:01, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk • contribs • count) 15:16, 16 September 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Comments[edit]
- According to the checker an ISBN is wrong haven't found which one yet
- In the lead its USAAF but the first mention in the article under United States plans has United States Army Air Corps. Then USAAF in the next paragraph.
- I've added a reference to the change of name in June 1941
- The first American Volunteer Group is followed by the second Air Volunteer Group, is this correct or should if be second American Volunteer Group?
- Both should be 'American Volunteer Group' - fixed
- CN tag for Dolittle
- Is there anything on the Japanese response to the F13 missions in the Initial attacks from the Mariana Islands section.
- Added
- Do we know why Hansell was relieved of command
- Due to Arnold's frustration with the Command's poor results and his headquarters wanting a focus on area attcks - added.
- Some of the books have the publishing locations missing for consistency they should all be the same; Harris Samuel Russ, LeMay Curtis, and Mann Robert
- Fixed
- I have changed some wording in the article you should check you are happy with the changes.
While not part of the review, I have noticed that some reviewers further up the assessment scale are asking for 10 number ISBNs to be changed to 13 number . There is an on line tool to do this if you need it here. [1] Jim Sweeney (talk) 07:30, 18 September 2011 (UTC)