Talk:Air policing

Untitled

Pleasedo not rederict this page. It was redireted two times to 2 diffrend pages, both of this pages did not cover the topic of air policing.. Air policing is an international therm used in aivatic... just google Baltic air policing , Island air policing..

FFA P-16 (talk) 14:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Redirected

This article seems to cover the same subject as Air sovereignty and two editors have now redirected it there. The original article was so poorly written and sourced as to be incomprehensible. It was hard to understand what it was supposed to be about. - Ahunt (talk) 14:58, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

I revertet TWO times an redirection of the page. The first redirection lead to a differend page as the second redirection. So both redirections lead to TWO differend pages. And both pages don't cover thet topic of the page "Air policing". Also I explaned this on the Talkpage. The Redirection does not cover the meaning of Air policing, or just a tini fragment of it just covering the USA National part, but not the NATO, or International part of air policing. Just google, Baltic Air policing, Island Air Policing,... or Air policing missions, Live-Missions , Hot-Missions and so one. Air policing is much more than this redriection to Air sovereignty.FFA P-16 (talk) 15:13, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

BTWBaltic Air Policing, Icelandic Air Policing.

Or google: "Renegade (Luftfahrt)", Southern Air Policing, Air Policing Benelux, Air Policing Albania, Air Policing Slovenia. FFA P-16 (talk) 15:26, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

The article as it was written did not make any sense. It is also hard to understand what you have written above. You are obviously working hard to write in English, but it is also clear that you don't have enough command of the language to make yourself understood. Would it not be better to contribute to the Wikipedia in your own first language? - Ahunt (talk) 15:28, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

Why it did not made any sens, it described what air policing is. Yes i do some mistakes in english but there are a few wery kind people on eng wikipedia who fix such thing (and i am very thankful that they do this). Wel it is interesting that people who are friendly (please don't understand this wrong I dont say you are unfriendly) and open have no problem to understand what i write in english. I do a lot of contribute in my own language wikipedia. Please notice that the first redirection was going to an total differend topic. The second (now active one) leads to one who only cover the US National topic, but not the NATO, and/or international use. I know you are unhappy with me.. but may this discussion here can motivate a nativ english speaking person to expand the now redirectet articel, this would be very nice. I think air policing is enough important to menton it here. Like you say my englih is not good enough so its up to you (and others).. if therewill be something written in the english wikipedia woh explan air policing. I don't wana fight for this. Thank you.FFA P-16 (talk) 15:47, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

I can move the article moved to Draftspace as Draft:Air policing so your kind friends can rewrite it to proper English, as they have time. Then the article can be moved back to the main article. I strongly suggest that you create any new articles in Draftspace, as this will be much less stressful for you and others. - BilCat (talk) 16:05, 13 April 2017 (UTC)

. This would be good. Does here in the english wikipedia exist a list of articles in Draftspaces, so that people can finde them to work on it?FFA P-16 (talk) 16:15, 13 April 2017 (UTC)