Talk:Ahsham (Mughal Infantry)

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 November 2012. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

India

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles

A member of the Guild of Copy Editors, Miniapolis, reviewed a version of this article for copy editing on 21 February 2014. However, a major copy edit was inappropriate at that time because of the issues specified below, or the other tags now found on this article. Once these issues have been addressed, and any related tags have been cleared, please tag the article once again for {{copyedit}}. The Guild welcomes all editors with a good grasp of English. Visit our project page if you are interested in joining!
Please address the following issues as well as any other cleanup tags before re-tagging this article with copyedit: Apparent rough translation

Review issues[edit]

Both this article and the companion article Mughal Artillery are based on a single 1903 book. The creator of these two articles has contributed only minor items to other articles about Indian subcontinent history. I have tagged these two articles for several problems, but really only rewriting will suffice to bring these two articles up to Wikipedia standards of historical articles.

As a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors, I cannot tag this article or its companion for copy-editing, as the problems are too severe for that approach. --DThomsen8 (talk) 00:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although the article was re-tagged (without a reason) in December 2012, the prose in many places remains incomprehensible to a native English speaker. Copyediting and rewriting are two different things. Miniapolis 17:30, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]