Talk:Age management medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Longevity Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Longevity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the World's oldest people on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LongevityWikipedia:WikiProject LongevityTemplate:WikiProject LongevityLongevity articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Longevity medicine (aging) was merged into Age management medicine with this edit on 11 April 2023. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

New section[edit]

I wrote about the differences between such terms as "age management" (which is a practical and theoretical framework and a set of approaches and methods) and other terms. It seems important since there have been a lot of developments and there is a need to differentiate between the terms. I've also added other definitions in the "See also" section for better understanding of the terms. Criticism section has been added and I also added categories "medical controversies", "future study" and "emerging technologies" This article is a stub and needs development and contributions from the other editors.--Suchexams (talk) 21:21, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process[edit]

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for creating this article. Currently the first 3/4 of the article is a presentation of, argument for and promotion of the concept as would be told by a proponent. The is not to suggest that the article is biased because criticism is also covered and so I did not tag it for that. But would suggest development of more text that is not as described above. Happy editing!.

North8000 (talk) 12:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Issues[edit]

Most of the references 1) were not about the topic in question 2) were promotional 3) and some were predatory. Have trimmed a lot. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 02:13, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]