Talk:Advance parole
 | This redirect is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
 | The contents of the Advance parole page were merged into Parole (United States immigration) on 10 September 2019 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Japan[edit]
This article talks a lot about American re-entry permits, but you also need a re-entry permit for Japan (assuming that you need a visa in the first place, which you might not need on all occasions, depending on nationality, length of stay and purpose of stay).
218.228.195.44 16:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Guarantee of re-entry[edit]
The last section says that re-entry is not guaranteed with advance parole. Only US citizens are guaranteed entry and even they are subject to CBP inspection. Every and any immigration benefit can be rescinded. Every immigrant and visitor must know this obvious fact.
FAQ[edit]
This page reads like a FAQ, and is most probably copy-pasted from a website, consider COPYVIO? -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email guestbook complaints 13:44, 20 May 2009 (UTC)
Who needs Advance Parole?[edit]
The language at the end of this paragraph:
==Note: Aliens holding valid K-3 or K-4 visas, as well as H-1 (temporary worker in a specialty occupation) or L-1 (intra-company transferee) visas and their dependents in H-4 or L-2 status who have filed for adjustment of status do not have to file for advance parole as long as they maintain their non-immigrant status.[1]
Contains the typical government jargon popularised by tax returns and immigration documents, and is thus largely incomprehensible except to experts - such statements take the general form:
You do not need to do Foo unless you are Bar.
However, Bar is seldom explained/linked to layperson readable documentation, and the frequency/likelihood of Bar is not given, nor are the likely conditions under which Bar holds. In this case Bar is linked to a government code, which falls squarely into 'only understandably by immigration lawyers', rather than a guide for the layperson.
An unsophisticated reader can understand either:
- I need to do Foo.
- I do not need to do Foo.
Depending upon whether Bar sounds familiar or not.
Suggestion:
Add a sentence explaining whether or not K3, K4, and H1 holders are likely to maintain their non-immigrant status, or not, and if not, the (popular) name of the process which would change that.
For instance:
H1 holders ... who have filed for adjustment of status do not have to file for advance parole as long as they maintain their non-immigrant status. The popular family pastime of pinoche usually involves relinquishing non-immigrant status during the final flop.
I understand that wikipedia is not intended as legal advice, but a lay understanding makes further research easier to do.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2620:149:4:1503:9b0:9d3d:69dd:91cf (talk) 20:17, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Advance parole. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130303041710/http://www.justice.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/vol25/3748.pdf to http://www.justice.gov/eoir/vll/intdec/vol25/3748.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:54, 4 October 2016 (UTC)