Talk:A Nod Is As Good As a Wink... to a Blind Horse
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Fair use rationale for Image:Faces-A Nod Is as Good as a Wink...To a Blind Horse (album cover).jpg[edit]
Image:Faces-A Nod Is as Good as a Wink...To a Blind Horse (album cover).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
.jpg){kind=link}
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Faces-A Nod Is as Good as a Wink...To a Blind Horse (album cover).jpg[edit]
Image:Faces-A Nod Is as Good as a Wink...To a Blind Horse (album cover).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:24, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Future reference for addition of Reception section.[edit]
Here's an archived link to the original Rolling Stone review by Jon Landau: Web Archive. It's definitely lukewarm, but perhaps an interesting contrast to other more positive reviews. Landau, Jon (January 6, 1972). "Rolling Stone: Album reviews". Rolling Stone. No. 99. Archived from the original on 15 May 2008.
Most successful?[edit]
But Ooh La La reached No. 1 and Cindy Incidentally reached No. 2, so how come this was more successful than that? --69.70.241.6 (talk) 01:30, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Ooh La La was less successful in the USA than Nod, and like it or not, that seems to be how success is measured. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HippyGumbo (talk • contribs) 20:44, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Monty Python quote?[edit]
Does anyone know if the faces were Python fans since the album's title is almost a Python quote (from the 'Say No More!" sketch)? Johnalexwood (talk) 11:53, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Album name[edit]
Is the official name of the album "A Nod's As Good..." or "A Nod Is As Good..." ? Subtle difference, but I think we should be consistent here - the page title uses "Nod Is" but the article text uses "Nod's". We should try find an official source and stick with whatever it says. Jordan Mitchell Barrett (talk) 11:38, 10 October 2022 (UTC)
- There seems to be two variants of the album art - one uses "nod is" while the other uses "nod's". Anyone know the story here? Jordan Mitchell Barrett (talk) 11:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)