Talk:ABC Movie of the Week

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Television C‑class Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for Image:Movieofbook.jpg[edit]

Image:Movieofbook.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Duelweaver.jpg[edit]

Image:Duelweaver.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 16:06, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adding Tag[edit]

I've added the tag for the WikiProject Television. I thought the article contained a lot of good information considering that the topic is essentially a discussion of a format rather than an actual television series. But others may wish to change the rating. JimVC3 (talk) 17:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pondering the proclamation the article is "essentially a discussion of a format rather than an actual television series." I may be interpreting the above declaration improperly but if my thoughts are correct I look upon the ABC Movie of the Week as being an ongoing broadcast entity that is "an actual television series." With hunger pangs coursing through my body and unable to access my vittles vending dumpster behind the fast-food joint I lean back and contemplate my likely approaching demise. May this post be my epitaph.Obbop (talk) 14:24, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained filmography changes by IP editors[edit]

In recent months a great many films were removed from the Filmography section by an IP editor without explanation. Perhaps the editor believes they don't belong, though on what basis it's impossible to say. These edits are going to have to be checked by someone with access to appropriate reference material; the removals don't seem to be justified in any way. P.T.isfirst (talk) 05:41, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plot line dropped below entry[edit]

If that makes sense... While I love the fantastic effort the editor has put into listing all six seasons, in many cases his plot lines "drop" below the main entry instead of being put in the far right column. I fixed one, but there are so many, and perhaps the editor likes that look better than I. I see no need to do the "colspan" heading. But I will defer if he sees this, as, again, I APPLAUD his effort. Sir Rhosis (talk) 03:00, 30 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]