Talk:20 to 1: Outrageous TV Characters

Deletion of the article[edit]

Oh no, we are NOT going to go through this again. Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/20 to 1: One Hit Wonders for the epsiode from two weeks ago.

Now, we learnt a lesson from that and that is you DON'T save the new article until there is sufficient information, because there are editors like Grocer who patrol Special:Newpages and tag new created articles with Template:AfD or with Template:Db as in this case.

Now, I appreciate Society sucks' contribution (in fact the creation of the article was their first edit) and of course I fully appreciate Grocer's Newpages patrol work, but as can be seen from the aforementioned AfD, the epsiodes are worthy of inclusion.

I taped the epsiode that aired last night, (it is currently 2:00 AM in Sydney, Australia at the moment, where I am located) and I will right the article up in the morning as I have done with previous epsiodes of this series.

Thanks -- Ianblair23 (talk) 15:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unbelievable, surely a lesson would have been learned from the previous AfD request. That's really all I have to say, is to express my disbelief. However it's good to see that everything appears to have been sorted out. R o gerthat ^Talk 10:53, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

eh, sorry about that --Grocer 03:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

episode article review notice[edit]

The individual episode articles for 20 to 1 are now being reviewed according to episode notability guidelines. Please contribute to the discussion on Talk:20 to 1#Episode review. Thanks. -- Ned Scott 04:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]