Talk:2015 French departmental elections

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Parties in the Results section[edit]

As the president is a Socialist, the "Presidential Majority" is no longer in blue, moreover the Nouveau Centre equivalent is now the UDI. And the categories are no longer valid as with tickets of 2 candidates a large number of lists are mixed ones, PS-PRG, PS-MRC, EELV-FDG, EELV-PG, etc. The official labels given by the Interior Ministry (without any assent of the lists) considers as "Union of the Left" any ticket with a PS candidate and mostly a PRG, MRC or "divers gauche" (including regional parties like Corse social-démocrate) candidate, idem for the "Union of the Right", UMP + UDI, Modem or "divers droite". This will make it impossible to give global percentages, and very difficult to count the councillors by parties. Anyway many campaign flyers don't mention a partisan affiliation, as for previous cantonal or municipal elections, to encourage people to vote across the parties borders. --Minorities observer (talk) 21:13, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The percentages given in the results now add to 91.08%, which may be down to this problem. Banak (talk) 04:07, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

they left out the second list of the left Union de la Gauche 8.17, Extreme left with 0.07, Union du Centre 0.29, and Debout la France (right-wing) with 0.4 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.53.16.30 (talk) 23:51, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on French departmental elections, 2015. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Single-member districts"[edit]

While two candidates may be elected on the same ticket/in pairs, I'm a bit confused why "single-member district" is used to describe the cantons. A single-member district is quite literally one in which a single candidate is elected. These appear to be multi-member districts/elections regardless of how those nominees are elected. Criticalthinker (talk) 11:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]