Talk:2013 North Indian Ocean cyclone season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Locations of advisories[edit]

IMD:

Main: Chief Meteorologist Feature and Forecast \\ Bulletin \\ Discussion/Outlook \\ Track \\ IMD website Shipping Bulletin \\ All India weather report
Other: Shipping Bulletin (1, 2) \\ Alternative Outlook \\ Archives

JTWC

Other: Storm 1 \\ Outlook \\ TCFA 1 \\ TCFA 2 \\ Best Track
Archives: JTWC (WTIO PGTW)

BoB 04 or Land Depression 1[edit]

Do we have any proof that the designator BOB 04 was used, as this system is being decribed as a land depression rather than a Bay of Bengal system. If we dont id like to propose that we use Land Depresion 01 rather than BOB 04 since the IMD classify land differently to BOB systems.Jason Rees (talk) 10:05, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Already done. But we should still use the IMD advisories for official designations, unless they happen to have none. LightandDark2000 (talk) 02:20, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, the system's actual name may be BOB 04, despite the lack of mention of that name. In the 2011 North Indian Ocean cyclone season, Land Depression 01 remained separate from the other storms, and the identifiers continued smoothly. However, in this cyclone season, there is BOB 03, a break, and then BOB 05, with Land Depression 01 in between. This leads me to believe that the storm's actual name may be BOB 04, so we might want to recheck sources and try to dig up the truth. LightandDark2000 (talk) 06:04, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Actually the numbering is now in order with Cyclone Phalin being BOB 04.Jason Rees (talk) 12:25, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. Thanks for the clarification. LightandDark2000 (talk) 05:41, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tracks of BOB03 and (LD)BOB04[edit]

There is no tracks of BOB03 and BOB04 for more than a month. What happened? Typhoon2013 (talk) 19:17, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Probably related to the lack of editing activity within these pages. I do not know the real reasons, but the individual storm tracks have been updated. You can ask Cyclonebiskit or Keith Edkinds to update the summary track, but only after Helen dissipates. LightandDark2000 (talk) 02:18, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Podul[edit]

Can we refrain from saying Podul, entered the NIO unless we get a source for it please.Jason Rees (talk) 16:04, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For the record both 30W and Phaliyn were tracked by the JTWC through the STWAs across the Malay Penisular unlike Podul/Helen.Jason Rees (talk) 19:25, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I noticed that as well, which makes it all the more frustrating. However, there is a chance that the storms may actually be the same. But in case they aren't, I opened a discussion on Podul's talk page. You are more than welcome to take part in it. LightandDark2000 (talk) 02:16, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Turns out that they are separate systems. However, the 2 storms are still related, since the remnant energy of Podul resulted in the development of a new area of low pressure, which eventually became Cyclonic Storm Helen. LightandDark2000 (talk) 06:01, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Have you got a warning center saying this? if not we can not say it.Jason Rees (talk) 12:24, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Entered basin on...[edit]

Is it necessary to mention when a system had entered the basin? I think it makes the infobox look ugly.. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 05:09, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Its necessary for Phalin but not yet for 30W.Jason Rees (talk) 19:01, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

JTWC[edit]

Will whoever the heck it is please stop adding in the crap from JTWC??! We all know that statistics from that agency are extremely unreliable, which is why we don't use them. If we did, we would already use it wherever possible instead of accurate data. You can ask Jason Rees, Cyclonebiskit, or any other users from their imput, but just stop adding in the crap! LightandDark2000 (talk) 22:55, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The reason that the JTWC is "avoided" is not necessarily that they are unreliable; rather, the IMD is the WMO-sanctioned warning center for the region. The JTWC shouldn't necessarily be removed from the article but the IMD should take precedence IMO. — Iune(talk) 04:06, 16 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mahasen name changed to Viyaru?[edit]

according to the India Meteorological Department.. Cyclonic Storm Mahasen is recorded in the 2013 cyclone archives as "Viyaru". http://www.rsmcnewdelhi.imd.gov.in/images/pdf/archive/bulletins/2013/RMAHA.pdf — VOFFA (talk) 06:33, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 60 external links on 2013 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:40, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 69 external links on 2013 North Indian Ocean cyclone season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:2013_North_Indian_Ocean_cyclone_season&oldid=1204390002"