Talk:1930 Bago earthquake

1930 Bago earthquake has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 1, 2023. (Reviewed version).

A fact from 1930 Bago earthquake appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 January 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that during the 1930 Bago earthquake, a witness observed surface waves propagating through a tennis court?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/January. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1930 Bago earthquake.

Wikipedia

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Earthquakes Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Myanmar High‑importance

1930 Bago earthquake is within the scope of WikiProject Myanmar, a project to improve all Myanmar related articles on Wikipedia. The WikiProject is also a part of the Counteracting systemic bias group on Wikipedia aiming to provide a wider and more detailed coverage on countries and areas of the encyclopedia which are notably less developed than the rest. If you would like to help improve this and other Myanmar-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.MyanmarWikipedia:WikiProject MyanmarTemplate:WikiProject MyanmarMyanmar articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet, requested articles on Burmese subjects and articles on smaller towns and villages
Expand : Top-importance and High-importance articles
Photo : add photos of incumbent politicians
Stubs : Category:Myanmar stubs
Update : offices, ministries and politicians of current cabinet after 2015 election
Other : If you know Burmese, go on the Myanmar Wikipedia and make sure each article on the English Wikipedia has one in Burmese also

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:1930 Bago earthquake/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 17:56, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Hey Dora the Axe-plorer, I've seen you around Wikipedia quite a lot! Anyways, before I conduct my review I wish to disclaim that my knowledge on earthquakes is elementary; nevertheless, I hope that I can still give a good review and learn some things! 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 17:56, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, these should be all my concerns. Fantastic article! If the review seems on the shorter side this is because most fixes were minor and I could do them myself. Please ping me once you have addressed my concerns. I will put the article on hold for now but this should not take long. Also, no hard feelings if you wish to respectfully disagree with any of my points; we can probably work it out. Good luck, 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 18:34, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @LunaEatsTuna, thanks for taking up the review. I've addressed the prose issues. "The presence of citations in the introduction is neither required in every article nor prohibited in any article" per MOS:LEADCITE but I've moved that into the body. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 23:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the notice. 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 23:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fantastic work! I am now pleased to pass this article for good article status per the changes. Congratulations Dora the Axe-plorer, and I wish you luck on your other active earthquake GANs. 𓃦LunaEatsTuna (💬) 23:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

Copyvio check[edit]

Earwig says everything is good to go.

Files[edit]

File:The Shwemawdaw Pagoda (15354947282).jpg: good, CC-BY-SA 2.0;
File:Shwedagon Pagoda 1900.JPG: good, valid public domain rationale;
File:Yangon downtown at night.jpg: good, CC-BY-SA 4.0.

Prose[edit]

Per WP:CITELEAD, the lead generally does not need citations unless content is controversial. Citations 2 and 3 are already cited later in the article; is it possible to use the first citation elsewhere in order to remove it from the lead?

Some localities mentioned in Earthquake should be wikilinked, e.g. Tongyi appears to have an article at Tongyi, Mingin.

"Widespread ground deformation was reported. Surface ruptures, fault scarps and fissures appeared." – might be personal taste but I reckon the full stop could be replaced with a semi-colon.

"Several historically large and damaging earthquakes occurred on this fault." – does the source give any examples? If they have Wikipedia entries, this may be interesting to our readers.

"for centuries but there is limited academic research to understand their" – unlink "academic research"; it is currently a redirect to research, a primary topic that seems unnecessary to link as most readers known what research is.

"Shaking was violent enough to create large fissures, and thrusted alluvium was observed during surveys of the land." – wikilink alluvium.

"The earthquake left a significant part of Bago in ruins" – does this sentence mean that an important area of Bago was ruined, or that a large part of Bago was ruined? If the latter, rephrase to "The earthquake left a significant portion of Bago in ruins" to avoid confusion.

References[edit]

All citations are usable (reliable) and formatted correctly.

Spot check on refs 4, 8, 10, 20, 21 and 26 show no concerns—they all support the article's content.

Other[edit]

Recommend adding template:Use X English {{Use X English|date=January 2023}} (woah, '23!)

Infobox, short description, cats and navboxes all good; nice work!

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Red-tailed hawk (talk) 16:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the 1930 Bago earthquake was a 7.4 moment magnitude earthquake that struck Myanmar, possibly killing up to 7,000 people? Source: https://www.nytimes.com/1930/05/07/archives/5000-to-7000-killed-in-burmese-quake-tidal-wave-wrecks-port-rangoon.html (for the up to 7000 dead).
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/BMX XXX

Improved to Good Article status by Dora the Axe-plorer (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 22:25, 3 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Hi @Onegreatjoke:, thanks for nominating this for DYK. I thought of another hook that would be more interesting.
ALT1: ... that during the 1930 Bago earthquake, a witness observed surface waves propagating through a tennis court? Source: Coggin Brown (1932); Records of the Geological Survey of India Vol. LXV, Part 2; Page 221-270 (page 2 of PDF).

Would you like to consider this blurb instead? Thanks. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 23:18, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dora the Axe-plorer and Onegreatjoke (talk), review follows: article promoted to GA on 1 January; article is well written and cited inline throughout to what appear to be reliable sources; I don't have access to some of the sources but found no issue with overly close paraphrasing in a spotcheck; a QPQ has been carried out; hooks are both interesting enough for me; I added moment magnitude to the first hook as magnitude by itself is ambiguous; AGF on source for the magnitude, other facts check out to the sources cited. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 11:07, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]