This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
@RoySmith: I outlined my rationale in a bit more detail at User talk:Luisasworldofjoy. This page, along with the plethora of "[year] in [country]" pages (e.g. 1699 in France), looks like a list to me. As far as I'm aware, verifiability applies to lists. So to have an unreferenced list should be no different to an unreferenced article. What I was expecting is a reference for each bullet point (or at least a good proportion of them), because we don't accept unsubstantiated facts and we don't accept "the linked Wikipedia pages are implicit sources" either. Is this contrary to procedure in this area? — Bilorv(c)(talk) 23:15, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I defer to your judgement. -- RoySmith(talk) 23:47, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
