Talk:1000 Piazzia

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance

	Astronomy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
	This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled[edit]

The links/references provided can not be the sole sources if information in this article, I am adding {{unreferenced}} Jeepday 04:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

This has been tagged for notabiltiy, so opening discussion. Like all asteroids under 2000, needs discussion before redirecting/keeping as is. Pinging tagger Carbon6 and creator Python eggs. If found non-notable, redirection to List of minor planets: 1–1000 would be the best option. Boleyn (talk) 18:01, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike the case with 501 Urhixidur, this asteroid is a smaller main-belt asteroid that appears to lack enough data to make it notable. I would support a redirect unless more data can be found to prove its notability. Carbon 6 21:13, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This asteroid, as with most, rates as a Low importance object and should be kept. This is not some provisionally named minor body with few observations. --mikeu ^talk 21:26, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mu301, without something unique or special to say about Piazzia, it is going to be hard to make a fairly common main-belt asteroid that is less than 50km in diameter very notable by Wikipedia standards. Piazzia does not even get brighter than apparent magnitude 14.0. I once proposed making all MBAs greater than 50km in diameter notable by definition, but after the asteroid wars of 2015, I would say such a rule could/should only apply to MBAs greater than 70km in diameter. -- Kheider (talk) 19:53, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While size matters, especially for minor planets, there are other considerations to be taken into account as well. I think the revised the stub about the asteroid named in honour of Giuseppe Piazzi should no longer be considered for deletion, i.e. redirection to the List of minor planets#Main Index. In general, whenever you create a #REDIRECT, please remember to to fully implement its categories, defaultsort, section-anchor and cat-sortkeys, accordingly, and to remove the link on the mentioned list, as you would create a WP:SELFREDIRECT otherwise. Thx, Rfassbind – talk 22:52, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]