Marianne Dainton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Marianne Dainton is a scholar of interpersonal communication and a Professor in Communication at La Salle University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.[1] Dainton has made substantial contributions to the communication field with several publications concerning relationship maintenance and personal relationships.[2] In addition to her research, Dainton has contributed to mainstream press stories for the CBS Morning Show,[3] Wall Street Journal,[4] and The Philadelphia Inquirer [5][6] concerning relationship maintenance. As an author, she is widely held in libraries worldwide.[7]

Education[edit]

Marianne Dainton received her bachelor's degree from Villanova University, her master's degree from Ohio State University and doctorate from Ohio State University.

Publications[edit]

Books[edit]

  • Dainton, M., Lannutti, P. J., & Texter, L. A. (under contract). Conducting research for professional life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Dainton, M., & Zelley, E. D. (2014/2010/2005). Applying communication theory for professional life: A practical introduction, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (3rd edition in press)
  • Canary, D.J., & Dainton, M. (Eds.). (2003). Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.

Peer-reviewed journal articles[edit]

  • Dainton, M., Correa, G., Kohr, S., & Taormina, M. (in press). Public perceptions of organizational social media use: A uses and gratifications approach. Journal of New Communications Research.
  • Stewart, M., Dainton, M., Goodboy, A.K. (2014). Maintaining relationships on Facebook: Associations with uncertainty, jealousy, and satisfaction. Communication Reports, 27, 23–36.
  • Dainton, M., & Berkoski, L. (2013). Positive and negative maintenance behaviors, jealousy, and Facebook: Impacts on college students’ romantic relationships. Pennsylvania Communication Annual, 69, 35–50.
  • Dainton, M. (2013). Relationship maintenance on Facebook: Development of a measure, relationship to general maintenance, and relationship satisfaction. College Student Journal, 47, 113–121.
  • Dainton, M., Dunleavy, K.N., Aylor, B., & Pampaloni, A. (2012). Message Design Logics and student grade complaints: An analysis of student goals in emotional confrontations. Pennsylvania Communication Annual, 68, 10–38.
  • Dainton, M. (2008). The use of relationship maintenance behaviors as a mechanism to explain the decline in marital satisfaction among parents. Communication Reports, 21, 33–45.
  • Dainton, M., & Gross, J. (2008). The use of negative strategies for relationship maintenance. Communication Research Reports, 25, 179–191.
  • Dainton, M. (2007). Attachment and marital maintenance. Communication Quarterly, 55, 283–298.
  • Aylor, B., & Dainton, M. (2004). Biological sex and psychological gender as predictors of routine and strategic relational maintenance. Sex Roles, 50, 689–697.
  • Dainton, M. (2003). Equity and uncertainty in relational maintenance. Western Journal of Communication, 67, 164–186.
  • Dainton, M., & Aylor, B.A. (2002). Routine and strategic maintenance efforts: Behavioral patterns, variations associated with relational length, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 69, 52–66.
  • Dainton, M., & Aylor, B.A. (2002). Communication channels in the maintenance of long-distance relationships. Communication Research Reports, 19, 118–129.
  • Dainton, M., & Aylor, B.A. (2001). A relational uncertainty analysis of jealousy, trust, and the maintenance of long-distance versus geographically-close relationships. Communication Quarterly, 49, 172–188.
  • Aylor, B.A., & Dainton, M. (2001). Antecedents in romantic jealousy experience, expression, and goals. Western Journal of Communication, 65, 370–391.
  • Dainton, M. (2000). Maintenance behaviors, expectations, and satisfaction: Linking the comparison level to relational maintenance. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 17, 827-842
  • Dainton, M. & Stafford, L. (2000). Predicting maintenance enactment from relational schemata, spousal behavior, and relational characteristics. Communication Research Reports, 17, 171–180.
  • Stafford, L., Dainton, M., & Haas, S. (2000). Measuring routine and strategic relational maintenance: Scale development, sex versus gender roles, and the prediction of relational characteristics. Communication Monographs, 67, 306–323.
  • Dainton, M. (1998). Everyday interaction in marital relationships: Variations in relative importance and event duration. Communication Reports, 11, 101–110.
  • Dainton, M., Stafford, L., & Canary, D.J. (1994). Maintenance strategies and physical affection as predictors of love, liking, and satisfaction in marriage. Communication Reports, 7, 88–98.
  • Dainton, M. (1993). The myths and misconceptions of the stepmother identity: Descriptions and prescriptions for identity management. Family Relations, 42, 93–98.
  • Dainton, M., & Stafford, L. (1993). Routine maintenance behaviors: A comparison of relationship type, partner similarity, and sex differences. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 255–271.

Book chapters[edit]

  • Dainton, M. (2012). How do we maintain relationships? In A.K. Goodboy and K. Shultz (Eds.). Introduction to Communication Studies: Translating Communication Scholarship into Meaningful Practice (pp. 191–201). Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
  • Dainton, M. (2007). Sex versus gender in relationship maintenance. In L.B. Arnold (Ed.) Family communication: Theory and research (pp. 173–180). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Canary, D.J., & Dainton, M. (2006). Maintaining relationships through communication. In A. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.) The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships (pp. 2256–2312). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dainton, M., & Zelley, E. (2005). Social exchange theories: Interdependence and Equity. In D.O. Braithwaite & L.A. Baxter (Eds.) Engaging Theories in Family Communication: Multiple Perspectives (pp. 243–259). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Dainton, M. (2005). Cat Walk Conversations: Everyday communication in dating relationships. In J.T. Wood and S. Duck (Eds.) Composing relationships: Communication in everyday life (pp. 36–45). New York: Wadsworth.
  • Dainton, M. (2003). Erecting a Framework for Understanding Relational Maintenance: An Epilogue. In D.J. Canary & M. Dainton (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 299–321). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
  • Dainton, M., Zelley, E., & Langan, E. (2003). Maintaining friendships across the lifespan. In D.J. Canary & M. Dainton (Eds.), Maintaining relationships through communication: Relational, contextual, and cultural variations (pp. 79–102). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates.
  • Dainton, M. (1999). African-American, European-American, and Biracial couples’ meanings for and experiences in marriage. In T.J. Socha and R. Diggs (Eds.), Family communication in cultural perspective: Spanning African American and European American Worlds (pp. 147–165). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Dainton, M. (1995). Basic principles of interpersonal communication theory. In R.L. Hartman and L. Texter (Eds.), Advanced interpersonal communication (pp. 1–15). Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
  • Pohl, G.M., & Dainton, M. (1995). Attraction in interpersonal relationships. In R.L. Hartman and L. Texter (Eds.), Advanced interpersonal communication (pp. 113–130). Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
  • Dainton, M. (1995). Relationship escalation, maintenance, and dissolution. In R.L. Hartman and L. Texter (Eds.), Advanced interpersonal communication (pp. 131–148). Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.
  • Stafford, L., & Dainton, M. (1995). Parent-child interaction within the family system. In T.J. Socha and G. Stamp (Eds.), Parents, children, and communication: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Stafford, L., & Dainton, M. (1994). The dark side of "normal" family interaction. In W.R. Cupach and B.H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 259–280). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

External links[edit]

References[edit]

  1. ^ La Salle University (2015). Had a bet with her students that if they passed a test she would die her hair blue and she followed through. Marianne Dainton, Ph. D. Retrieved: 3 May 2016.
  2. ^ Daiton, M., & Zelley. E. D. (2015). Applying communication theory for professional life: A practical introduction (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  3. ^ CBS In The Morning (27 March 2013). Can lying help your marriage? Retrieved: 3 May 2016.
  4. ^ Bernstein, E. (26 March 2013). The Little Lies Spouses Tell. Retrieved: 3 May 2016.
  5. ^ O'Brien, E. (8 December 1998). Little Things Do Mean A Lot In Marriage At Least That's What The Latest Studies Indicate. Retrieved: 3 May 2016.
  6. ^ Visco, F. (16 March 2008). Time for a text etiquette Take this message: Texting is everywhere, texting can be rude. And we've yet to figure out a code of conduct for addicts who click, click, click. Retrieved: 3 May 2016.
  7. ^ "Dainton, Marianne". worldcat.org. Retrieved August 29, 2016.