File talk:En-dust-514-20200903.ogg
Spoken article quality assessment[edit]
Version reviewed: This revision
Technical quality: High
Clarity: Medium
Accuracy: High
Notes: Great audio quality, the extermely minor popping was not a problem. The article could be read a bit faster, and the pacing alternated throughout the article. Overall, great job!
Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.
Reviewed by: — Yours, Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 17:13, 3 September 2020 (UTC)