File talk:En-Bakerloo Line-article.ogg
Spoken article quality assessment[edit]
Version reviewed: Version 1
Technical quality: High
Clarity: Medium
Accuracy: High
Notes: Enunciation and pronunciation were somewhat difficult to understand at times, but pacing was clear and even. See also, Maps, References, and External links sections were not mentioned. Faithful to the article and handled the tables well.
Help with recording issues can be obtained under "Recording assistance" here.
Information on the assessment procedure can be found on the spoken article assessment page.
Reviewed by: Sennecaster Sennecaster (What now?) 22:17, 16 April 2021 (UTC)