Draft:The drawback of modern physics: from the perspective of a teenager

Draft article not currently submitted for review.

This is a draft Articles for creation (AfC) submission. It is not currently pending review. While there are no deadlines, abandoned drafts may be deleted after six months. To edit the draft click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

To be accepted, a draft should:

Show the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article by using multiple sources that meet four criteria. The sources should be (1) reliable (2) secondary (3) independent of the subject (4) talk about the subject in some depth. For some topics, there are alternative criteria.
Be written from a neutral point of view
Respect copyright and do not plagiarize. Do not copy-paste.

It is strongly discouraged to write about yourself, your business or employer. If you do so, you must declare it.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Last edited by Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk | contribs) 15 days ago. (Update)

Submit the draft for review!

The crisis of modern physics: from the perspective of a teenager

The world still remembers the majestic work of The General Theory of relativity by Professor Albert Einstein for a good reason, but is this the only reason? Is or generation doomed for not providing a good successor and a succession theory after Einstein? Is it true that we will never find the theory of everything? well the answer to this seems pretty invisible nowadays even though we are successful today for developing the strongest version of AI. But we very well know that, no revolution can happen without the mind of humankind. Even after the idea proposed by the string theorist, nowadays the physicist have spoken against it. Why? because with string theory we aren't reaching towards a proper conclusion. All the results of string theory are basically a complete mess and blunder that are either taking us to another dimension and idea that we don't need of we are simply wasting our time. I was simply surprised to see one of my favorite physicist breaking her silence on this blunder made by humankind...And I wish maybe after some time we will be able to see the triumph for mankind. A elegant theory which explains the aspect of nature from tiny quantum particle to the big celestials like planets and even Black holes will be an actual success for mankind from the world of physics. Thanks> ShambhaviStark2008 (talk) 17:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)