Draft:MultiFAZE mechanism

Submission declined on 21 April 2024 by ToadetteEdit (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by ToadetteEdit 30 days ago. Last edited by Bryllig 23 days ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 5 January 2022 by TheBirdsShedTears (talk).

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Declined by TheBirdsShedTears 2 years ago.

Submission declined on 22 August 2021 by Liance (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Declined by Liance 2 years ago.

Comment: It is best to convert external links to footnotes. Toadette ^{(Let's talk together!)} 13:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

Comment: I cannot find a single source that calls this a "MultiFAZE mechanism" besides this article. Q ^{T C} 01:37, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Comment: There are currently 16 refs in this draft, which do not indicate MultiFAZE mechanism. It seems a new compound eccentric mechanism invented by author. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:15, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

"MultiFAZE" is hidden away in Patent DE 3 232 974 drawing No. 4 (1982). Bryllig (talk) 23:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC)

They DO "indicate" MultiFAZE mechanism, because the so-called Stiller-Smith mechanism described in the references IS actually the MultiFAZE mechanism. Compare the priority dates of the patents. S&S just took the mechanism and renamed it with their own names. An article on the copy would surely meet Wikipedia rules, so how can an article on the original be rejected? Does Wikipedia want to support plagiarism by suppressing the original?

At least by publishing a string of technical papers on the mechanism, S&S made it notable/noteworthy. So please make this draft article official. Bryllig (talk) 02:41, 4 April 2022 (UTC)