Category talk:Tennis Channel Open

Tennis Category‑class

This category is within the scope of WikiProject Tennis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to tennis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TennisWikipedia:WikiProject TennisTemplate:WikiProject Tennistennis articles

Category

This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Tennis To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Take an item off the Cleanup listing
Copyedit : Roger Federer, Leander Paes, Rafael Nadal, Justine Henin – to be used as examples for ideal page structures
Expand : Grab a Start article and expand it, or peruse the List of articles.
Photo : Add photos to Tennis or Tennis people articles
Stubs : Bring a Stub up to our standards.
Other : *Sign up as a member of the project.
Tag more articles with our standard project template.
Help with the creation of yearly main articles and drawsheets for every Open Era ATP and WTA tournament.

Naming sub-categories[edit]

I have noticed that the names of the sub-categories for the individual tournaments and the main articles of the tournaments for that year are not always consistently named. For the first few editions the category and the main article both have the name of the tournament as it was that year - eg Category:1986 WCT Scottsdale Open and 1986 WCT Scottsdale Open and Category:1988 Eagle Classic and 1988 Eagle Classic. However after 1992 all the categories use the format Category:YEAR Tennis Channel Open, but the articles use the (sponsored) name of the tournament as it was that year. For instance Category:1995 Tennis Channel Open is the category, but the main article is 1995 MassMutual Championships. In fact it was only called the Tennis Channel Open from 2005-2008 so I think naming the individual year categories with this title is misleading. I know this is a problem for other tennis categories, but I thought it worth raising to see if a consensus can be reached on it. As it stands I think there is a real potential for confusion. Dunarc (talk) 23:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]