This category is within the scope of WikiProject Equine, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of articles relating to horses, asses, zebras, hybrids, equine health, equine sports, etc. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at the barn.EquineWikipedia:WikiProject EquineTemplate:WikiProject Equineequine articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
This category is within the scope of WikiProject Sports, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sport-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SportsWikipedia:WikiProject SportsTemplate:WikiProject Sportssports articles
Assess : newly added and existing articles, maybe nominate some good B-class articles for GA; independently assess some as A-class, regardless of GA status.
Cleanup : * Sport governing body (this should-be-major article is in a shameful state) * Field hockey (History section needs sources and accurate information - very vague at the moment.) * Standardize Category:American college sports infobox templates to use same font size and spacing. * Sport in the United Kingdom - the Popularity section is incorrect and unsourced. Reliable data is required.
* Fix project template and/or "to do list" Current version causes tables of content to be hidden unless/until reader chooses "show."
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rodeo, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.RodeoWikipedia:WikiProject RodeoTemplate:WikiProject RodeoRodeo articles
Same question as at rodeo, and probably same principle -- do we want this category to have people placed into appropriate subcategories as much as possible (mostly diffusing) or do we want every person and critter with a bio to be double-booked into this cat AND the subcat (i.e. non-diffusing). I started to diffuse the articles, but then figured I'd better stop and ask. Comments? Montanabw(talk) 05:21, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Montanabw (talk·contribs) hmmm, I never answered this? Yes, I vote for mostly diffusing. I think we did keep it diffusing. Just commenting it here so we have a record of it. dawnleelynn(talk) 18:41, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
