Category talk:Oil fields of Scotland

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Oil fields of Scotland category.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Scotland Category‑class

	Scotland portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Energy Category‑class

	Energy portal This category is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Category	This category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This category was nominated for deletion on 28 October 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

Category definition[edit]

The current category definition reads simply:

Oil fields of Scotland.

A discussion arising out of a CfD debate on this category led to a concern that the word "of" in the category title might be misleading, since oil licensing and taxation within the UK is currently a reserved matter under the Scotland Act 1998.

To clarify what the category describes, without getting too deeply into the ownership debate, I suggest that the category text should be changed to:

Oil fields in Scotland or its territorial waters, as defined by the Scottish Adjacent Waters Boundaries Order 1999.

Any objections| --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs)

You will not be in the least surprised to learn that yes, you do have an objection, if you intend to nominate the actual cat for renaming to "in". However, I support your idea for the introduction clarification. There is absolutely no case for naming one of these categories in a different fashion from all the others. Either rename all of this group of cats to "in" or none of them. The cat does not claim to be about licensing or taxation, simply about geographical location.

I note that we have Category:Mountains and hills of Scotland, Canada, Nigeria etc, but Category:Towns in Scotland, Brazil, India etc, so the "in" versus "of" terminology seems to be open to debate. Nominate the entire oil fields group of cats for renaming and I may well support your proposal. --Mais oui! 07:48, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]