Category talk:Mountain lakes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
WikiProject iconLakes Category‑class
WikiProject iconCategory:Mountain lakes is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WikiProject icon
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
WikiProject iconMountains Category‑class
WikiProject iconThis category is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
CategoryThis category does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Proposing for deletion[edit]

The redundancy - and potential vastness - of this category struck me when I saw it on Capilano Lake, which is one of BC's estimated, oh, maybe 5,000 lakes or so (major ones). Lakes in Switzerland and Norway are all also going to be all included, etc; there are already country/province/state lakes categories. This one seems to be vaguely defined - Titicaca is high-altitude but is not a "mountain lake" in the way the term is usually meant....I read through Wikipedia:Categories for deletion and it said to query the category talk page so that's why I'm here. I won't be around to follow through on this (I'm leaving wikipedia tomorrow because of life circumstances) but proposing it anyway; if all notable mountain lakes were in this category it would be HUGE, even just those in BC, AK, WA, CA, Switzerland and so on....and would be redundant with those varoius "lakes in" categories.Skookum1 22:17, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]