User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus

FAC candidates

• Cerro Panizos
• Socompa
• Licancabur
• Llullaillaco
• Sabancaya
• Misti
• Macauley Island, needs prose cleanup
• Aucanquilcha, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
• Cerro Guacha, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
• El Laco, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
• Lastarria, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
• Purico complex, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar
• Aguas Calientes caldera, needs a rewrite (and some mergers) with Google Scholar
• Pastos Grandes, needs a rewrite with Google Scholar or shortened.
• Mount Okmok
• Mount Aniakchak
• Candlemas Island
• Laguna Verde (Bolivia), needs expansion with talkpage sauces

Most of 'em need a root-and-branch rewrite first, though. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Deletion review question

Hi! I hope this message finds you well. I'm writing a piece for the signpost and came across this 2016 AFD for Margaret Nichols which you closed as delete. I believe there were a few issues with it (not your role in it) which I think merit a review by yourself and/or other admins.

• The article was previously nominated at AFD in 2011 by User:James Cantor, whose colleagues had been criticized by Nichols in the past. There was no other support for a delete with multiple editors thinking it passed GNG and it was categorized as a USA, Sex and Gender, behavioral science, and author - related discussion.
• The 2016 AFD was created by a sock of Cantor (discovered in 2021), was only listed under academic-related discussions, and apart from himself only received two supports.

I'm unsure if the article did pass GNG (I can't see the history) so would like your opinion on 1) whether it might have been deleted unduly and 2) what to do in that case (would you undelete it, draftify it, take it to DRV, etc). Best regards, Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 16:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Greetings. I don't remember if back in the day I would consider 3 or 4 delete !votes (i.e if we treat Cantor and their sock as one account) as sufficient for a deletion. The sources are her own profile and articles that quote her without delving too deep in her as a person. The deletion was 8 years ago and 3-4 delete arguments is a low number. Are there more recent sources, say biographies about her or things that discuss her in some detail? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:05, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

I think so, I'm not so used to writing articles on academics so I'm not sure whether the comments in the original AFD about passing WP:NPROF held (and whether the article met criteria during the first AFD and was edited so it no longer did during the second).

• She's given TEDX talks and presented at conferences in the last few years[1][2]
• She's seems to have hundreds of citations from a check of google scholar
• This source says By far, the pioneer in this field [lesbian sex therapy] is Margaret Nichols, who has been writing about the subject since the 1980s. but I'm struggling to gain access to the rest of the text. [3]
• This one on p 27 says that in the 90s and early 2000s Nichols "developed proposals of more queer approaches in sex therapy" and discusses their POV in relation to mainstream sex therapy. [4]
• This source puts her book in a recommended reading section and describes her as a key pioneer working with LGBTQ+ clients with over 40 years of experience. Her book embraces current thinking on working with a wide range of clients [5][6]
• This goes into her views on sadomasochism[7]
• This discusses the politicization of AIDS, quotes Nichols, and notes she's the director of the Hyacinth Foundation, which was contracted to provide AIDS relief in New Jersey.[8]

I don't have time for more research tonight, but AFAICT she's incredibly highly cited when it comes to sex therapy, particularly for lesbian couples, and has been for decades. Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 22:21, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
189		South Sandwich Islands (talk)	Add sources
80		Eruption column (talk)	Add sources
912		Lake (talk)	Add sources
33		Moraine-dammed lake (talk)	Add sources
64		Hawaiian eruption (talk)	Add sources
189		Scoria (talk)	Add sources
45		Cytochrome P450 (individual enzymes) (talk)	Cleanup
396		Plain (talk)	Cleanup
47		Ambrym (talk)	Cleanup
91		Villarrica (volcano) (talk)	Expand
119		Estancia, New Mexico (talk)	Expand
51		Starspot (talk)	Expand
86		Antofagasta Region (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
361		Language change (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
3		Banksieaephyllum (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
267		IM-1 (talk)	Merge
58		Running up the score (talk)	Merge
544		Norfolk Southern Railway (talk)	Merge
22		Subboreal (talk)	Wikify
12		Skeena Mountains (talk)	Wikify
155		Environmental impacts of lithium-ion batteries (talk)	Wikify
4		Jorge H. Capdevila (talk)	Orphan
3		Buga Wood Pavilion (talk)	Orphan
2		CCAP Rhode Island (talk)	Orphan
19		Khakassian Che (talk)	Stub
7		Copiapó (volcano) (talk)	Stub
26		Slab (geology) (talk)	Stub
7		Cerro Bravo (talk)	Stub
136		Phosphophyllite (talk)	Stub
12		Acotango (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of El Negrillar

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article El Negrillar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kusma -- Kusma (talk) 16:23, 2 June 2024 (UTC)