I have seen the word "TAFI" before but never knew what it was - thanks to Mabeenot I become more wiki-educated Signpost by Signpost. THANK YOU.
As it happens, I just started a new article on a topic that I was amazed to find out was not on Wikipedia: Supermom. I wonder if it will be a good candidate for TAFI. Seems to me that it can fulfil the two goals: improving the article and appealing to new women editors who according to wp:Systemic bias are in short supply here. XOttawahitech (talk) 00:51, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
@Ottawahitech: Thank you for your question. At the time (I have since stopped doing this job although I would love to start it up again), I was bound by the social media that Wikipedia actively engaged in, which was none of the ones you listed. I suggested status to be posted through Wikipedia's accounts on those sites, and the WMF people did the actually posting on TAFI's behalf. I actually just started a new discussion at TAFI about starting up the social media side, so i'd love for you to weight in here: Wikipedia talk:Today's articles for improvement#Social media blurbs.--Coin945 (talk) 12:13, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
